HP Pro 3500 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pro 3500 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ABF
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '20 at 05:58
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 510
57% 446 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Lighting 41.4
Reflection 33.3
Parallax 44.9
34% 39.9 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 39.2
26% 30.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC1LE00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 164 155 140 166 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 248
Write 166
Mixed 159
SusWrite 159
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 18
60% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 51.7
DQ Mixed 59.7
52% 78.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
43GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 114 115 116 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 120
Write 115
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 115
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
283GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 80 79 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 91.2
Write 62
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 78.8
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
583GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 91 91 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 61.5
Write 62.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 89.8
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
82% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 57%
TOSHIBA MK4058GSX 400GB
97GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.3% Very poor
Read 29
Write 20.3
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 27.5
32% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.7
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3500 Series Builds (Compare 1,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3500 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback