MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory52.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201114
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 02:09
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT-$313
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 84.7
1-Core 163
2-Core 310
100% 186 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 1,051
99% 823 Pts
64-Core 1,534
95% 1,534 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 98%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 209
Parallax 200
178% 209 fps
MRender 195
Gravity 156
Splatting 138
130% 163 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 149%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,582
Write 1,747
Mixed 1,362
350% 1,564 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 82.9
294% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,352
DQ Write 1,129
DQ Mixed 1,218
918% 1,233 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 276%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
54GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 491 492 495 443 459 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 493
Mixed 409
SusWrite 477
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 65
220% 78.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 372
280% 373 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 135%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
511GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 164 164 163 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 165
Mixed 100
SusWrite 162
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 100%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
931GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 124 123 124 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 130
Write 117
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 123
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 114 114 115 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 109
Write 107
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 114
71% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$40
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 71 72 71 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 78
Write 67.7
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 71
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GVK CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 F4-3200C16-16GVK CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
89% Excellent
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 35.3
90% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 35.8
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 89%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $907
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback