| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110817 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 27 '17 at 18:20 |
| Run Duration | 103 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 37% |
PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
54.2%
Above average
|
58% 98 Pts
|
27% 213 Pts
|
16% 251 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Zotac(19DA 4263) 2GB
CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
|
13.2%
Very poor
|
12% 14.5 fps
|
15% 18.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
54.9%
Above average
|
54% 74.1 MB/s
|
58% 0.53 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCF0-DJ-F 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
|
31.8%
Below average
|
31% 10.9 GB/s
|
23% 8 GB/s
|
44% 90.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H61-M LE/CSM Builds (Compare 262 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $136Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 39x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 34x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 32x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 28x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 21x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $164 |