Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE/CSM  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '17 at 18:39
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 158
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 286
38% 282 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Zotac(19DA 4263) 2GB
CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 15.9
12% 14.4 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 15.3
15% 19 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 92.8
Write 94.3
Mixed 31.9
53% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.33
78% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 70%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
2GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 12.3
Mixed 15.8
22% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 1.35
128% 2.36 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCF0-DJ-F 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LE/CSM Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback