Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM (all builds)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110817
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '17 at 18:56
Run Duration	86 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 84.4 2-Core 168 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 333 43% 326 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Zotac(19DA 4263) 2GB CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Lighting 15 Reflection 12.5 Parallax 15.2 12% 14.3 fps	MRender 20.1 Gravity 20.2 Splatting 14.8 15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 70845127 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3157 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 509943633 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 25445 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3209 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 5 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 47 572063778 (C2) HDA temperature 34 53 42949672994 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 45 21 70845127 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -23343147219700 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1486962465 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4213936790	54.4% Above average	Read 94.4 Write 95 Mixed 31.9 54% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.38 86% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCF0-DJ-F 6GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.5% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 14 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 11.8 36% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M LE/CSM Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $189Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	39x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	34x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	32x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	28x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
SU655 120GBAdataBench 68%, 3,439 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x

RAM
1600 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 4,816 samples	9x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 21,220 samples	7x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369