Medion S6445 MD61194

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMedion S6445 MD61194  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION M15WUN
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190917
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 07 '21 at 13:47
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 21%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 64.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 239
75% 140 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 582
58% 472 Pts
64-Core 535
33% 535 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Device(1E39 A006) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 8.6
6% 6.6 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 11
7% 8.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S11-128G-PHISON-SSD-B3 128GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 92 83 62 58 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43% Average
Read 351
Write 208
Mixed 277
SusWrite 79.3
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 9.2
63% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 28.7
DQ Mixed 36.6
52% 102 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43%
Great: 82%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
906GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 89 96 95 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 53.1
Write 82
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 92.8
51% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.4
147% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
40% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 10.9
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S6445 MD61194 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Medion S6445 MD61194

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback