Biostar A960D+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar A960D+ (all builds)
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140904
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 24 '20 at 13:11
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100 29,222 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 63.7 2-Core 149 62% 102 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 328 36% 284 Pts	64-Core 339 21% 339 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X1120G 120GB 1,708 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 38 17 60 42 54 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.8% Average	Read 225 Write 118 Mixed 144 SusWrite 45.8 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 23.6 90% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 26.2 DQ Write 45.3 DQ Mixed 25.7 22% 32.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59 15,217 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 182GB free Firmware: PB3OC60F SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 40 17 59 43 54 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 63 Write 63.3 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 46.4 38% 51.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 42%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB 40,989 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 909GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 89 89 90 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	Read 85.4 Write 71.4 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 89.2 54% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 61%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 1320 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	5.49% Terrible	Read 14.8 Write 8.5 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 10.8 12% 9.85 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.49% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3 1600 Kingston 9905403-432.A00LF 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 800, 667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.7% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 7.3 24% 8.47 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 8.3 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 62.9 64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A960D+ Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+

CPU
FX-6350 Six-CoreAMD $100Bench 59%, 29,222 samples	10x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	10x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	4x

SSD
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	2x
TS120GSSD220S 120GBTranscendBench 70%, 8,401 samples	2x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $51Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	7x
F3-1600C11-4GNS F3-1600C11-4GNS 8GBUnknownBench 35%, 56 samples	3x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 16GBUnknownBench 40%, 1,247 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $251

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16