Biostar A960D+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar A960D+  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140904
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 10 '21 at 01:30
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$55
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 146
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 335
37% 292 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.3
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.8% Average
Lighting 63.5
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 81.4
52% 51.9 fps
MRender 61.2
Gravity 57.3
Splatting 43.1
43% 53.9 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X1120G 120GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 43 45 17 36 37 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.4% Below average
Read 187
Write 138
Mixed 150
SusWrite 37.2
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 21.4
86% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 24.7
DQ Write 47.1
DQ Mixed 28.5
24% 33.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
53GB free
Firmware: PB3OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 43 46 19 37 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 47.3
Write 44.5
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 37.9
29% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 42%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
790GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 91 92 90 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 83.8
Write 81.5
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 90.7
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3 1600 Kingston 9905403-432.A00LF 8GB
800, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
43.8% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 14.7
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 11.3
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A960D+ Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $206
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback