Biostar A960D+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar A960D+  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '21 at 02:11
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$55
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 125
61% 96.8 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 341
38% 298 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.3
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.8% Average
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 19.4
Parallax 81.8
53% 55.5 fps
MRender 61.5
Gravity 57.3
Splatting 43.3
43% 54 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X1120G 120GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 53 32 21 42 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.2% Average
Read 153
Write 140
Mixed 154
SusWrite 42.3
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 28.4
105% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 32.2
DQ Write 61.1
DQ Mixed 32.6
29% 42 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
46GB free
Firmware: PB3OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 42 45 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 46.2
Write 46.3
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 44.9
30% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 42%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
554GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 73 66 50 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 85
Write 81.7
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 62.3
51% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 61%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
1GB free, PID 1320
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
5.47% Terrible
Read 14.8
Write 9.2
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 10.7
13% 10 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.47%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3 1600 Kingston 9905403-432.A00LF 8GB
800, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 12.2
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A960D+ Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $206
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback