MSI Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A59
MotherboardMSI Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59)  (all builds)
Memory43.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '20 at 13:01
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 90%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 140
2-Core 274
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 641
69% 546 Pts
64-Core 685
42% 685 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 151
Parallax 151
124% 152 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 133
Splatting 118
116% 146 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$65
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 212 244 230 214 257 MB/s
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
87.5% Excellent
Read 221
Write 195
Mixed 137
SusWrite 234
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 54.4
151% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 234
209% 315 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 118%
Samsung MZYTE256HMHP-000L2 256GB
172GB free
Firmware: EXT06L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 209 201 206 202 209 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55% Above average
Read 246
Write 163
Mixed 148
SusWrite 205
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 16.3
64% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 74.2
115% 223 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55%
Great: 93%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
119GB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 320 309 314 310 312 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 177
Write 174
Mixed 136
SusWrite 312
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 22.3
88% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 318
242% 326 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 104%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
173GB free
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 48 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 58.7
Write 72.8
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 47.5
40% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZB 04CD F4-3200C16-16GIS 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZB 04CD F4-3200C16-16GIS 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.5% Very good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 21.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59) Builds (Compare 714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59) - $146

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $738
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback