MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201030
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 12 '20 at 16:20
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 73.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
92% 174 Pts
4-Core 591
8-Core 1,006
97% 798 Pts
64-Core 1,395
86% 1,395 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
PNY(196E 1348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.7% Very good
Lighting 91.1
Reflection 90
Parallax 83.3
74% 88.1 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 78.9
Splatting 70.9
70% 87.8 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 590 274 270 270 271 271 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2,069
Write 1,262
Mixed 686
SusWrite 324
239% 1,085 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 69.4
272% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,259
DQ Write 1,082
DQ Mixed 709
657% 1,017 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 237%
Great: 236%
Asmt 2115 128GB
35GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 206 206 202 207 200 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 313
Write 218
Mixed 197
SusWrite 201
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 23.1
81% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 47.9
63% 114 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 63%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$32
223GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 321 115 115 115 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 463
Write 405
Mixed 346
SusWrite 186
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 17.5
101% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 29.1
84% 176 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 86%
Ocz-agility2 3.5 180GB
159GB free
Firmware: 1.37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 76 76 74 80 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 152
Write 126
Mixed 128
SusWrite 76.6
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 30.6
118% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 103
81% 113 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%
Sabrent Rocket Q 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2403 2313 2484 2458 2421 2311 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
343% Outstanding
Read 1,330
Write 2424
Mixed 1,446
SusWrite 2,398
432% 1,900 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 80
285% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,212
DQ Write 1291
DQ Mixed 1,343
985% 1,282 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 343%
Great: 368%
WD Game Drive 5TB
2TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 95 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 120
Write 88.5
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 94.6
125% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
113% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4R.M8FE1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.2% Very good
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 31.3
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 31
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550-A PRO (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 9,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $752
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback