MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201030
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 00:40
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 259
89% 161 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 931
87% 722 Pts
64-Core 1,402
87% 1,402 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
PNY(196E 1348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3580 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Lighting 97.5
Reflection 95.6
Parallax 90.2
80% 94.4 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 84.6
Splatting 77.5
74% 93.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,950
Write 1,467
Mixed 737
305% 1,385 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 57.4
220% 84.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,173
DQ Write 1,144
DQ Mixed 811
705% 1,043 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Asmt 2115 128GB
35GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 313
Write 215
Mixed 196
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 25.1
92% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 77.5
81% 132 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 63%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
223GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 410
Write 406
Mixed 351
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 16.6
88% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 28.8
79% 163 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 86%
Ocz-agility2 3.5 180GB
159GB free
Firmware: 1.37
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 116
Write 105
Mixed 116
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 28.6
105% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 102
80% 112 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 52%
Sabrent Rocket Q 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1239
Write 2,158
Mixed 1,378
359% 1592 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 67.6
212% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,014
DQ Write 1,251
DQ Mixed 1,321
944% 1,195 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 368%
WD Game Drive 5TB
2TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 103
Write 95.7
Mixed 69.7
111% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.7
186% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4R.M8FE1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 37
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 34.6
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550-A PRO (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 9,635 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $753
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback