MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics79.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '21 at 08:00
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 151
2-Core 296
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 982
92% 765 Pts
64-Core 1,427
88% 1,427 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
PNY(196E 1348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3580 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Lighting 99.6
Reflection 97.8
Parallax 91.5
81% 96.3 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 87.4
Splatting 78.9
75% 94.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 597 283 283 281 281 279 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 2,096
Write 1,358
Mixed 518
SusWrite 334
237% 1,076 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 57.5
242% 96.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1086
DQ Write 1,204
DQ Mixed 944
766% 1078 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 228%
Great: 236%
Asmt 2115 128GB
17GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 206 203 201 198 201 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 314
Write 215
Mixed 198
SusWrite 199
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 23.5
82% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 72.3
70% 111 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 63%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
222GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 310 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 422
Write 415
Mixed 354
SusWrite 183
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 18.8
114% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 28.7
81% 169 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 86%
Ocz-agility2 3.5 180GB
159GB free
Firmware: 1.37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 75 73 70 76 57 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 116
Write 102
Mixed 117
SusWrite 72.6
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 32.6
124% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 99.5
DQ Mixed 104
81% 111 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%
Sabrent Rocket Q 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2502 2545 2527 2497 2533 2531 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
352% Outstanding
Read 1,382
Write 2,398
Mixed 1,498
SusWrite 2,522
444% 1,950 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 82.7
294% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1046
DQ Write 1,326
DQ Mixed 1,420
1,006% 1,264 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 352%
Great: 368%
WD Game Drive 5TB
2TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 94 95 94 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 104
Write 94.7
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 94.6
124% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4R.M8FE1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 37.4
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 38.5
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550-A PRO (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 9,635 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $753
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback