Moi-mmrviq6ggs Moi-MMRVIQ6GGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMoi-mmrviq6ggs Moi-MMRVIQ6GGS  (all builds)
MotherboardMoi-MMRVIQ6GGS Moi-MMRVIQ6GGS
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '20 at 22:10
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 84.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 252
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 866
83% 687 Pts
64-Core 1,055
65% 1,055 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 866E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 3900 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 119
Parallax 140
109% 131 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 131
Splatting 109
110% 138 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,588
Write 4,888
Mixed 5,318
1,382% 6,265 MB/s
4K Read 423
4K Write 261
4K Mixed 315
1,183% 333 MB/s
DQ Read 1312
DQ Write 913
DQ Mixed 1,026
790% 1,084 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
48GB free
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 25 155 63 63 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 434
Write 231
Mixed 240
SusWrite 95.6
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.4
36% 8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 55%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
309GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 170 171 170 171 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 164
Mixed 61.4
SusWrite 170
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.5
437% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 97%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TYP4U3200E16082C 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 36.3
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 29.5
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 31.9
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 110%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback