ADD TO PC
BUILD

Moi-mmrviq6ggs Moi-MMRVIQ6GGS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Moi-mmrviq6ggs Moi-MMRVIQ6GGS (all builds)
Motherboard	Moi-MMRVIQ6GGS Moi-MMRVIQ6GGS
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200702
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '20 at 13:04
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Memory 83.9 1-Core 123 2-Core 244 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 491 8-Core 778 78% 634 Pts	64-Core 1,006 62% 1,006 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Asus(1043 866E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 93% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 647 177 137 126 113 108 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 48GB free Firmware: UE3000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 34 27 30 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 445 Write 65 Mixed 116 SusWrite 29.1 35% 164 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 9.9 49% 12.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 55%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68 105,708 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 389GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 43 44 44 44 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 202 Write 44.2 Mixed 58.2 SusWrite 44.1 64% 87.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TYP4U3200E16082C 2x8GB 361 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 45.1 MC Write 42.9 MC Mixed 36.4 118% 41.5 GB/s	SC Read 27.7 SC Write 41.9 SC Mixed 32.8 98% 34.1 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback