TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Moi-mmrviq6ggs Moi-MMRVIQ6GGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMoi-mmrviq6ggs Moi-MMRVIQ6GGS  (all builds)
MotherboardMoi-MMRVIQ6GGS Moi-MMRVIQ6GGS
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '20 at 19:49
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 83.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 834
81% 664 Pts
64-Core 1022
63% 1022 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 87.8%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 866E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.8% Good
Lighting 77.1
Reflection 90.8
Parallax 73.5
63% 80.5 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 78.4
Splatting 86.1
74% 92.2 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 66.8%
 Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 78 75 70 63 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 421
Write 74.1
Mixed 121
SusWrite 73.3
37% 172 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2
48% 10.9 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 34.2%
 Great: 129%
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
48GB free
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 35 33 36 34 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 450
Write 64
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 35.4
34% 160 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 10
50% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 34.9%
 Great: 55%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
389GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 197
Write 45
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 42.6
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 68.6%
 Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TYP4U3200E16082C 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 46.1
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 36.4
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 29.8
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 34.1
102% 35.6 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 68% ↑
This bench: 116%
 Great: 113%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback