ADD TO PC
BUILD

Moi-mmrviq6ggs Moi-MMRVIQ6GGS

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	96.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Moi-mmrviq6ggs Moi-MMRVIQ6GGS (all builds)
Motherboard	Moi-MMRVIQ6GGS Moi-MMRVIQ6GGS
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200702
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '20 at 21:24
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	75% Very good	Memory 81 1-Core 117 2-Core 223 79% 140 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 479 56% 431 Pts	64-Core 482 30% 482 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Asus(1043 866E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	96.7% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 119 Parallax 126 97% 121 fps	MRender 167 Gravity 110 Splatting 88.3 96% 122 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 7,110 Write 5,783 Mixed 6,517 1,442% 6,470 MB/s	4K Read 423 4K Write 306 4K Mixed 303 1,192% 344 MB/s	DQ Read 1,246 DQ Write 924 DQ Mixed 1067 802% 1,079 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 48GB free Firmware: UE3000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 38 28 31 31 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 407 Write 44.3 Mixed 85 SusWrite 33.5 30% 143 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 8.7 41% 10.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 55%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68 105,708 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 389GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 41 43 43 43 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	66.8% Good	Read 195 Write 4 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 38 44% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TYP4U3200E16082C 2x8GB 361 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 40.7 MC Write 40 MC Mixed 36.4 112% 39 GB/s	SC Read 30.1 SC Write 39.6 SC Mixed 32.9 98% 34.2 GB/s	Latency 78.8 51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback