ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus H61M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-C (all builds)
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130609
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '14 at 12:43
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1620-$49 2,566 User benchmarks, average bench 49% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 74.3 2-Core 148 50% 111 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 148 20% 148 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 34% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 844D) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2884 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.54% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.58 Parallax 1.28 1% 1.49 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 3.17 2% 2.38 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.54% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 39 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 18 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 64 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 285762684
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 401GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 139 137 4041 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2591 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9495 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2582 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 70 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2520 (C2) HDA temperature 108 97 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	66% Good	Read 119 Write 111 Mixed 52.3 69% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.35 106% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 69%
WD My Book 1140 2TB 10,094 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1TB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 93.3 Write 99.7 Mixed 34 92% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.13 78% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 49%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 577GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 92.9 Write 78.2 Mixed 54.3 92% 75.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.16 55% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical H61M-C Builds (Compare 767 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-C - $105

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	111x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	86x
Core i3-3240IntelBench 55%, 37,789 samples	79x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	117x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	53x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	32x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	21x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	17x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	12x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $192

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback