Asrock Z97 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140523
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 20 '20 at 12:11
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 95.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 214
81% 139 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 396
56% 410 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Lighting 68.5
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 67.1
56% 68.1 fps
MRender 73.9
Gravity 63.5
Splatting 54.9
51% 64.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 473
Write 354
Mixed 313
84% 380 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 13.9
67% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 32.8
92% 195 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 103%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
10GB free
Firmware: 4.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 71 77 78 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 73.2
Write 38
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 75.3
42% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 54%
ADATA HDD CH94 320GB
4GB free, PID a94a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 39.7
Write 39
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 40.9
49% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
78GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 50 62 62 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 83.2
Write 85.7
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 57.2
86% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 20.5
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 19.4
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 66%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Pro4 Builds (Compare 909 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Pro4 - $77

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $725
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback