Hyrican GA-78LMT-S2P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHyrican GA-78LMT-S2P  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P
Memory0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 10 '19 at 23:57
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 27.4
2-Core 37
37% 48.2 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 111
14% 109 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
Gigabyte(1458 2551) 1GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.9.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.83% Terrible
Lighting 1.97
Reflection 5.12
Parallax 9.78
2% 5.62 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 9.03
Splatting 6.48
5% 6.28 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 2.83%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 33 24 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 101
Write 74.4
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 28.7
41% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 112%
ADATA HDD CH94 320GB
293GB free, PID a94a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 16 14 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.49% Terrible
Read 17.3
Write 14.2
Mixed 17
SusWrite 15
22% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.1
45% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.49%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
24.2% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 0.2
5% 1.73 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback