Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 16 '20 at 22:18
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$130
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 141
2-Core 282
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 534
67% 512 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$490
Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 221
Reflection 179
Parallax 191
180% 197 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 151
Splatting 127
125% 157 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 149%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 74 74 81 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 424
Write 119
Mixed 152
SusWrite 75.8
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 98.3
4K Mixed 33
140% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 144
130% 206 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 124%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
36GB free
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 18 104 164 144 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 451
Write 362
Mixed 238
SusWrite 125
65% 294 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 20
84% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 44.6
38% 57.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
265GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 132 135 135 134 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 81.5
Write 88.7
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 132
65% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
55% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 99 99 98 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 122
Write 134
Mixed 66
SusWrite 97.8
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
3GB free
Firmware: CC26
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 102
Write 75
Mixed 62
59% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
51GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 76 77 76 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 69.8
Write 63.7
Mixed 57
SusWrite 75.4
49% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 31.6
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 40.9
SC Mixed 28.9
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 100%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 13,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $752
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback