Acer Aspire TC-780

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	16.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire TC-780 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire TC-780(KBL)
Memory	18.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180528
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '20 at 02:22
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 124 2-Core 227 81% 145 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 674 66% 540 Pts	64-Core 685 42% 685 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Lighting 38.3 Reflection 31 Parallax 41.2 31% 36.9 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 37.8 Splatting 36.1 30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 225GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 31 31 41 30 31 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	16.5% Very poor	Read 47.7 Write 97.6 Mixed 82.7 SusWrite 39.3 15% 66.8 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 19.2 4K Mixed 8.6 39% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 10.5 DQ Write 15.4 DQ Mixed 14 10% 13.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 102%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 146 146 119 126 147 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 128 Write 118 Mixed 85 SusWrite 138 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2400 C16 Series Kingston ACR24D4U7D8MB-16 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	71.7% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 22.4 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 27.2 SC Mixed 21.6 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire TC-780 Builds (Compare 1,589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-780

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $93Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	872x
Core i5-6400Intel $78Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	232x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	193x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	328x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	177x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	163x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	38x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	32x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	32x

RAM
ACR24D4U7S8MB-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 39%, 2,540 samples	88x
AM2P24HC4U1-B9QS AM2P24HC8T1-BUSS 12GBAdataBench 56%, 513 samples	69x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 7,235 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $93

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16