Acer Aspire TC-780

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Aspire TC-780 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire TC-780(KBL)
Memory	17.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180528
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '23 at 21:12
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$275 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 80.5 1-Core 102 2-Core 197 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 527 55% 443 Pts	64-Core 572 35% 572 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$350 301,333 User benchmarks, average bench 100% MSI(1462 397D) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.24 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	100% Outstanding	Lighting 131 Reflection 118 Parallax 123 107% 124 fps	MRender 140 Gravity 104 Splatting 90.3 89% 111 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$26 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 31 32 38 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	28.8% Poor	Read 297 Write 266 Mixed 236 SusWrite 24.6 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 8.1 4K Mixed 4.9 42% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 13.2 DQ Mixed 19.5 30% 60.2 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 102%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$47 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 129 129 130 131 132 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 121 Write 119 Mixed 81.4 SusWrite 127 83% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 184% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2400 C16 Series Kingston ACR24D4U7D8MB-16 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.5% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.7 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 19: 2R 3G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
19%	26%	19	217	59	60	52"	1296 759	HEC0030 HDMI

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire TC-780 Builds (Compare 1,132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-780

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $160Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	631x
Core i5-6400Intel $170Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	167x
Core i7-7700Intel $275Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	138x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	244x
GTX 1050Nvidia $110Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	135x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	114x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	33x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	26x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	23x

RAM
ACR24D4U7S8MB-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 39%, 2,540 samples	63x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 7,235 samples	54x
AM2P24HC4U1-B9QS AM2P24HC8T1-BUSS 12GBAdataBench 56%, 513 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $160

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $315	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420	Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12600K $224	Nvidia RTX 3060 $350	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $153	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $830	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $41	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16