Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0FPV4P
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateNov 11 '20 at 23:35
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 204
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 507
54% 434 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 70
Parallax 63.2
56% 67.2 fps
MRender 73.5
Gravity 64.5
Splatting 56.2
52% 64.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 325 361 360 364 362 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 364
Mixed 322
SusWrite 328
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 37.2
134% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 269
211% 289 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 129%
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
101GB free
Firmware: 582ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 130 130 130 132 130 MB/s
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.2% Above average
Read 230
Write 148
Mixed 171
SusWrite 128
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 27.2
104% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 155
120% 165 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 83%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
210GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 356 404 401 396 396 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 417
Mixed 388
SusWrite 360
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 46.8
160% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 364
260% 335 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$74
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 154 168 174 169 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 94.6
Write 124
Mixed 62
SusWrite 159
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 35
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $418
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback