Lenovo 81FK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 81FK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '20 at 20:01
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 122
66% 105 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 454
56% 425 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 38EC) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4575
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Lighting 33.5
Reflection 25
Parallax 33.7
27% 30.7 fps
MRender 35.2
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 22.6
24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256GD9TNG-62A0A 256GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001E00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 255 251 241 247 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 1,109
Write 567
Mixed 984
SusWrite 238
161% 724 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 47.2
155% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 602
DQ Write 77.7
DQ Mixed 191
177% 290 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 122%
Great: 163%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Kingston 9905700-051.A00G 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.4% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 11
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81FK Builds (Compare 1,283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback