Acer Predator PT315-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator PT315-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Auris_CFS
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200309
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateAug 22 '21 at 11:02
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User BRN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 208
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 421
47% 371 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 139F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.01% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 57.9
Parallax 4.8
4% 22.7 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 8.8
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.01%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00007 512GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7102Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 980 805 828 821 824 836 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,541
Write 2,206
Mixed 1,625
SusWrite 849
403% 1,805 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 71
226% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 912
DQ Write 744
DQ Mixed 837
624% 831 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 261%
Great: 293%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Kingston 9905700-051.A00G 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.3% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 17.7
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 42: 6R 4G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
42% 50% 20 183 93 144 15.5" 1536 864 LGD061E
History: Score 34: 6R 1G 1B | Score 42: 6R 4G 0B
Typical Predator PT315-51 Builds (Compare 352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PT315-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback