Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 175% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 170% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	179% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190311
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 02 '20 at 08:48
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 95.6 1-Core 148 2-Core 290 98% 178 Pts	4-Core 571 8-Core 1,174 102% 873 Pts	64-Core 1,162 72% 1,162 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% MSI(1462 3892) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	179% Outstanding	Lighting 258 Reflection 254 Parallax 292 210% 268 fps	MRender 299 Gravity 238 Splatting 143 177% 227 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,360 Write 1,292 Mixed 1,134 350% 1,595 MB/s	4K Read 59.3 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 77.9 263% 91.8 MB/s	DQ Read 977 DQ Write 1,356 DQ Mixed 1009 806% 1114 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 43GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 348 255 251 193 137 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 468 Mixed 389 SusWrite 272 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 89.7 4K Mixed 55.9 186% 63.1 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 350 263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 134%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB 77,062 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 354GB free Firmware: S5Z42105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1026 494 493 494 495 492 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	139% Outstanding	Read 1,325 Write 1,467 Mixed 124 SusWrite 582 195% 875 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 44.1 4K Mixed 36.7 119% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 542 DQ Write 71.9 DQ Mixed 124 138% 246 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 311%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC9D SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 174 170 181 173 177 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Read 142 Write 53.7 Mixed 38.3 SusWrite 168 73% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 160 162 162 161 161 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Read 113 Write 138 Mixed 69 SusWrite 159 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 133 135 135 135 135 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Read 172 Write 132 Mixed 83.9 SusWrite 133 96% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 113%
PI-239 USB 2.0 Drive 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1.5TB free, PID 1840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 43 42 41 42 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16% Very poor	Read 18 Write 32.4 Mixed 29.2 SusWrite 41.6 44% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 76% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB 11,534 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	57.8% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 16.6 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 18.4 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 55.3 72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	883x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	546x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	471x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	284x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	243x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	204x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	133x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	88x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	108x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	74x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 115% - Outstanding

Total price: $552

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16