Lenovo 3227A11

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Lenovo 3227A11 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory	26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181211
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '20 at 14:54
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 87.4 2-Core 208 71% 126 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 512 55% 436 Pts	64-Core 504 31% 504 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Lighting 15.5 Reflection 12.9 Parallax 13.9 13% 14.1 fps	MRender 5.43 Gravity 16.6 Splatting 18 12% 13.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 295 296 301 300 285 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 450 Mixed 384 SusWrite 308 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 47.8 137% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 364 274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 124%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB 11,708 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 200GB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 77 75 75 75 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 83.9 Write 73.8 Mixed 25.4 SusWrite 74.2 47% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 75%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB 11,708 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 262GB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 92 92 92 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	54% Above average	Read 96.7 Write 98.4 Mixed 20.6 SusWrite 91.5 56% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 75%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 135 135 136 135 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 139 Write 139 Mixed 77.4 SusWrite 135 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 100%
WDC WD30 EURX-63T0FY0 3TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 343GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 0.2 0.6 0.1 0.2 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 104 Write 100 Mixed 65.8 SusWrite 0.6 84% 67.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 23%
WDC WD30 EURS-63SPKY0 3TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 927GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 59 80 44 102 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	44% Average	Read 130 Write 131 Mixed 71.2 SusWrite 80.7 136% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 46%
WDC WD20 EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 97 100 104 103 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 96 Write 96.8 Mixed 76.7 SusWrite 101 126% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 43%
WDC WD20 EURS-73TLHY0 2TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 36 23 58 3.7 1 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Read 123 Write 125 Mixed 78.2 SusWrite 21.3 111% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 125% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 32GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	53.8% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.3 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 18 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 3227A11 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3227A11

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 8490AMDBench 2%, 4,568 samples	1x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	1x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	1x

SSD
MX500 4TBCrucial $273Bench 100%, 1,824 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 32GBMicronBench 53%, 7 samples	2x
9905458-020.A00LF K531R8-ETB 8GBKingstonBench 26%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $570

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16