TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77-D3H  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120221
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 02 '22 at 18:41
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 182
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 366
46% 349 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 71.2%
 Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
EVGA(3842 1057) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.4% Average
Lighting 58
Reflection 57.5
Parallax 49.7
47% 55.1 fps
MRender 41.8
Gravity 53.2
Splatting 47.3
39% 47.4 fps
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 44.4%
 Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 176 165 162 169 163 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.9% Above average
Read 221
Write 215
Mixed 195
SusWrite 164
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 34.1
112% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 40
DQ Write 91.1
DQ Mixed 53
44% 61.4 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 56.9%
 Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
647GB free
Firmware: CC4D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 26 27 24 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 64GB
50GB free, PID 00ff
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 5.3 3.8 4.7 4.9 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
2.03% Terrible
Read 7.2
Write 1.7
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 4.3
6% 4.85 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 2.03%
 Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.8
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 54.2%
 Great: 54%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-Z77-D3H Builds (Compare 1,981 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel  $30Bench 68%, 185,516 samples630x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples406x
Core i7-3770KIntel  $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples252x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples136x
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples124x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples103x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples58x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples47x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples47x
RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples50x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 50%, 27,024 samples46x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples39x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback