Lenovo 3227A11

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	92.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Lenovo 3227A11 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory	25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181211
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '20 at 14:03
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	63%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 77.6 1-Core 101 2-Core 189 70% 123 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 403 45% 354 Pts	64-Core 465 29% 465 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 297 300 299 282 290 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Read 460 Write 445 Mixed 392 SusWrite 309 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 58.4 4K Mixed 36.5 128% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 350 264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 124%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB 11,708 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 200GB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 71 74 74 78 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 83.8 Write 76.5 Mixed 18.6 SusWrite 72.5 46% 62.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 75%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB 11,708 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 262GB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 91 93 92 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 100 Write 98 Mixed 30.6 SusWrite 90.9 58% 80 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 75%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 61 59 58 62 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 124 Write 99.7 Mixed 48.7 SusWrite 60.7 61% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 100%
WDC WD30 EURX-63T0FY0 3TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 343GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	22% Poor	Read 107 Write 103 Mixed 67.4 SusWrite 0.5 87% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 23%
WDC WD30 EURS-63SPKY0 3TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 927GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 73 103 55 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 133 Write 129 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 88.9 140% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 46%
WDC WD20 EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 102 102 102 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	42% Average	Read 96.2 Write 95.4 Mixed 81.2 SusWrite 101 128% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 43%
WDC WD20 EURS-73TLHY0 2TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.6 29 0.7 47 1.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 127 Write 123 Mixed 77.4 SusWrite 13.3 107% 85 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 122% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 32GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.8% Above average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 16.1 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 17.6 48% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 85.2 47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 3227A11 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3227A11

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 8490AMDBench 2%, 4,568 samples	1x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	1x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	1x

SSD
MX500 4TBCrucial $273Bench 100%, 1,824 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 32GBMicronBench 53%, 7 samples	2x
9905458-020.A00LF K531R8-ETB 8GBKingstonBench 26%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $570

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16