Asus PRIME Z490-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics90.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z490-P  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '20 at 10:29
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$226
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 151
2-Core 304
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 942
93% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,544
96% 1,544 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 101%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Zotac(19DA 6527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.5% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 118
Parallax 108
96% 114 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 90.8
Splatting 84.4
81% 101 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1024 799 803 808 812 799 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,495
Write 2,372
Mixed 1789
SusWrite 841
419% 1,874 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 82.6
281% 99.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,182
DQ Write 853
DQ Mixed 1,066
783% 1,034 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 283%
Great: 355%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 151 153 152 150 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 104
Write 133
Mixed 65
SusWrite 150
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 90%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
84GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 100 96 99 98 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 79.1
Write 79.5
Mixed 50
SusWrite 96.6
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 100%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
45GB free, PID 0743
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 64 64 64 64 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 86.6
Write 61.2
Mixed 63.1
SusWrite 62.3
89% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 3.2
218% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 44%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 147 147 147 147 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 154
Write 155
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 146
179% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3007 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 27.6
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 41.2
SC Mixed 28.8
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z490-P Builds (Compare 10,653 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z490-P - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,049
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback