Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 118% UFO	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 119% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	367% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	29 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200722
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '20 at 18:13
Run Duration	372 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 89.2 1-Core 159 2-Core 309 101% 186 Pts	4-Core 610 8-Core 1,122 104% 866 Pts	64-Core 1,483 92% 1,483 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 3732) CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3625 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Lighting 148 Reflection 132 Parallax 147 121% 143 fps	MRender 160 Gravity 135 Splatting 108 107% 134 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 522GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1728 1648 1645 1673 1682 1515 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	367% Outstanding	Read 2,698 Write 2,635 Mixed 1,961 SusWrite 1,648 502% 2,236 MB/s	4K Read 68.5 4K Write 188 4K Mixed 97.8 329% 118 MB/s	DQ Read 1,377 DQ Write 1,164 DQ Mixed 1274 954% 1,272 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 367% Great: 410%
Sandisk S3512G 512GB 19,948 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 110GB free Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 312 314 312 313 317 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 438 Mixed 245 SusWrite 314 84% 376 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 89.3 4K Mixed 54 178% 61.4 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 253 DQ Mixed 288 211% 275 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 119%
Sandisk S3512G 512GB 19,948 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 188GB free Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 311 314 312 312 316 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 438 Mixed 248 SusWrite 314 84% 377 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 54.5 164% 62.3 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 217 168% 235 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 119%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 146GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 316 318 315 316 320 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 493 Mixed 418 SusWrite 318 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 47.6 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 48.6 199% 72.8 MB/s	DQ Read 286 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 368 252% 308 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 134%
Sandisk S3512G 512GB 19,948 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 119GB free Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 311 313 311 311 315 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 444 Mixed 290 SusWrite 313 87% 389 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 86.4 4K Mixed 54.5 177% 60.5 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 252 DQ Mixed 266 200% 266 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 119%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 510GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1088 1075 628 99 134 135 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	200% Outstanding	Read 1,360 Write 1112 Mixed 917 SusWrite 527 219% 979 MB/s	4K Read 57.4 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 77.4 271% 98.4 MB/s	DQ Read 623 DQ Write 717 DQ Mixed 267 313% 536 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 255%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 129 126 124 126 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Read 138 Write 125 Mixed 70 SusWrite 126 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 959GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 98 98 97 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	55.5% Above average	Read 96.2 Write 92.4 Mixed 62 SusWrite 96.9 64% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 67%
WD easystore 2625 2TB 1,227 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1TB free, PID 2625 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 89 90 90 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 181 Write 97.4 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 89.8 132% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB 388 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 44.8 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 43.5 110% 38.5 GB/s	SC Read 29.6 SC Write 27 SC Mixed 44 96% 33.5 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 171%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 663 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	218x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	40x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $154Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $182Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $759

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)