Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 118% UFO	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 119% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	357% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200722
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '20 at 23:37
Run Duration	392 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 89.7 1-Core 158 2-Core 311 101% 186 Pts	4-Core 601 8-Core 1,146 104% 873 Pts	64-Core 1,481 92% 1,481 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 3732) CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3625 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Lighting 148 Reflection 134 Parallax 149 120% 143 fps	MRender 169 Gravity 138 Splatting 108 110% 138 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 657GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 797 1640 1633 1546 1527 1555 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	357% Outstanding	Read 2,702 Write 2,633 Mixed 1,949 SusWrite 1,450 490% 2,184 MB/s	4K Read 69.3 4K Write 190 4K Mixed 99.2 333% 120 MB/s	DQ Read 1,376 DQ Write 1,171 DQ Mixed 1,277 956% 1,275 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 357% Great: 410%
Sandisk S3512G 512GB 19,948 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 139GB free Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 341 340 338 340 339 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 385 Write 460 Mixed 207 SusWrite 340 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 37.8 165% 64.1 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 291 236% 335 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 119%
Sandisk S3512G 512GB 19,948 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 118GB free Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 341 339 338 340 339 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 494 Mixed 191 SusWrite 340 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 31.7 165% 63.6 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 191 178% 275 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 119%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 175GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 342 340 339 341 340 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 496 Mixed 406 SusWrite 341 98% 438 MB/s	4K Read 47.6 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 65.8 224% 80.2 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 372 280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 134%
Sandisk S3512G 512GB 19,948 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 148GB free Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 340 338 337 339 338 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 430 Mixed 243 SusWrite 339 83% 372 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 37.1 154% 61.4 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 291 236% 335 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 119%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 568GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1120 1130 1132 269 480 1130 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	225% Outstanding	Read 1,373 Write 1,123 Mixed 937 SusWrite 877 241% 1,077 MB/s	4K Read 59.9 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 80.4 280% 101 MB/s	DQ Read 638 DQ Write 725 DQ Mixed 273 319% 545 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 225% Great: 255%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 135 136 136 135 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Read 133 Write 124 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 135 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 965GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 103 103 103 103 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Read 104 Write 97.3 Mixed 58.4 SusWrite 102 66% 90.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 67%
WD easystore 2625 2TB 1,227 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1TB free, PID 2625 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 114 114 113 114 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 169 Write 119 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 114 154% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.5 123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 64%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 124GB 623 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 115GB free, PID 00ed, PNY 128GB Turbo Attaché 3 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 24 26 29 25 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	20.7% Poor	Read 86.6 Write 53.1 Mixed 85.7 SusWrite 27.9 81% 63.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 1.4 78% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB 388 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 44.8 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 43.9 110% 38.7 GB/s	SC Read 29.8 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 44.2 96% 33.7 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 171%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 663 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	218x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	40x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $154Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $182Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $759

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)