Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 111% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	352% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200722
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '20 at 20:02
Run Duration	371 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	97.9% Outstanding	Memory 88.5 1-Core 156 2-Core 306 100% 184 Pts	4-Core 576 8-Core 1,064 98% 820 Pts	64-Core 1,473 91% 1,473 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 3732) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	108% Outstanding	Lighting 139 Reflection 126 Parallax 130 113% 132 fps	MRender 159 Gravity 131 Splatting 102 104% 131 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$76 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 505GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1198 1603 1569 1535 1515 1529 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	352% Outstanding	Read 2,629 Write 2,484 Mixed 1,887 SusWrite 1,491 476% 2,123 MB/s	4K Read 67.4 4K Write 182 4K Mixed 96.2 322% 115 MB/s	DQ Read 1,343 DQ Write 1,148 DQ Mixed 1,250 936% 1,247 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 352% Great: 410%
Sandisk S3512G 512GB 19,948 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 197GB free Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 396 396 397 397 402 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 446 Write 428 Mixed 295 SusWrite 402 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 53.9 190% 69.3 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 154 171% 290 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 119%
Sandisk S3512G 512GB 19,948 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 237GB free Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 397 402 395 396 394 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 486 Mixed 395 SusWrite 409 101% 447 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 52.6 188% 68.8 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 292 237% 337 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 119%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 206GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 490 491 490 491 491 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 488 Mixed 419 SusWrite 490 107% 475 MB/s	4K Read 46.3 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 64.5 216% 76.7 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 370 279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 134%
Sandisk S3512G 512GB 19,948 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 217GB free Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 394 393 393 394 395 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 486 Mixed 204 SusWrite 397 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 50.6 171% 64.9 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 172 168% 263 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 119%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 331GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 731 102 135 107 103 103 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	180% Outstanding	Read 1,356 Write 1,106 Mixed 916 SusWrite 214 200% 898 MB/s	4K Read 57.3 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 77.4 267% 96.1 MB/s	DQ Read 638 DQ Write 721 DQ Mixed 269 316% 543 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 180% Great: 255%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 112 109 110 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	67% Good	Read 124 Write 128 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 110 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 184% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 81 82 83 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 78 Write 80 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 81.7 58% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 67%
WD easystore 2625 2TB 1,227 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 793GB free, PID 2625 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 85 85 85 85 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 168 Write 119 Mixed 84.9 SusWrite 85.2 144% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.4 168% 2 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB 388 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 44.5 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 44 110% 38.5 GB/s	SC Read 29 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 44.2 96% 33.4 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 171%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	217x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $201Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $190Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $760

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)