Acer Predator PO9-900

Performance Results


Gaming 101% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 113% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Acer Predator PO9-900 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator PO9-900
Memory	59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 15 '20 at 18:48
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Memory 72.5 1-Core 139 2-Core 283 88% 165 Pts	4-Core 463 8-Core 944 83% 704 Pts	64-Core 1,693 105% 1,693 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 37A8) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	122% Outstanding	Lighting 163 Reflection 169 Parallax 174 133% 169 fps	MRender 182 Gravity 146 Splatting 108 115% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 401GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1643 1099 790 795 793 793 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	264% Outstanding	Read 2,136 Write 1,702 Mixed 1,527 SusWrite 986 355% 1,588 MB/s	4K Read 53 4K Write 166 4K Mixed 67 254% 95.2 MB/s	DQ Read 988 DQ Write 860 DQ Mixed 921 691% 923 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 264% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 21GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 86 88 87 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	44% Average	Read 66.9 Write 43.7 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 86.6 46% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 114%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 14TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 6TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 119 119 120 120 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	90.9% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 199 Mixed 87 SusWrite 119 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 2.5 524% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 91%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 14TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 12.5TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 119 119 120 120 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	84.9% Excellent	Read 174 Write 198 Mixed 143 SusWrite 119 117% 158 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 3.6 774% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 85%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 14TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 6.5TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 119 120 120 120 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	80.9% Excellent	Read 162 Write 148 Mixed 138 SusWrite 118 105% 141 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 2.4 575% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 81%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 14TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 6TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 119 120 120 120 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	82.3% Excellent	Read 167 Write 195 Mixed 136 SusWrite 118 114% 154 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 3.3 729% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 82%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB 5,644 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 77GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 176 173 157 150 149 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 168 Write 178 Mixed 108 SusWrite 163 208% 154 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.2 217% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 96%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$7 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 11GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.1 9.4 11 7.8 8.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	26.9% Poor	Read 117 Write 5.5 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 6.8 32% 36.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 3.4 215% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 35%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 119GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 81 82 82 81 82 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 140 Write 142 Mixed 20.1 SusWrite 82.3 121% 96.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 35% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Kingston ACR26D4U9D8MH-16 Kingston ACR26D4U9D8MH-16 64GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 35.5 MC Write 57.7 MC Mixed 34.7 122% 42.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 11.4 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 95.6 42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PO9-900 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 111%

UFO

System: Acer Predator PO9-900

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	38x
Core i7-7800XIntel $206Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	25x
Core i9-9900XIntel $620Bench 84%, 3,521 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	29x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $365Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	22x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,135Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	17x

SSD
PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 189%, 2,051 samples	14x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $125Bench 128%, 20,782 samples	8x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBIntel $192Bench 217%, 33,949 samples	8x

RAM
HMA82GU6CJR8N-VK 2x16GBHynixBench 84%, 1,261 samples	15x
ACR26D4U9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 75%, 687 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 8x16GBCorsairBench 115%, 173 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $892

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359