Acer Predator PO9-900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator PO9-900  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO9-900
Memory55.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '20 at 15:20
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 259
80% 151 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 979
86% 733 Pts
64-Core 1697
105% 1697 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Sapphire(174B 1470) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Lighting 244
Reflection 169
Parallax 179
199% 197 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 172
Splatting 120
113% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 156%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57XA4104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,060
Write 503
Mixed 797
174% 787 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 25.7
105% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 926
DQ Write 69.2
DQ Mixed 59.1
154% 352 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 235%
WD My Passport 262E 1TB
869GB free
Firmware: 1085
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 328
Write 300
Mixed 287
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 17.1
60% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 47.9
DQ Mixed 78.4
77% 130 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 175
Write 142
Mixed 83.2
99% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 114%
Seagate Desktop 1TB
752GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37.8
Write 39.2
Mixed 30.8
46% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston ACR26D4U9D8MH-16 Kingston ACR26D4U9D8MH-16 64GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
101% Outstanding
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 55.8
MC Mixed 33.1
117% 41.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 9.4
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PO9-900 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PO9-900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $892
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback