Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive380% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '20 at 19:15
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Memory 80.8
81% 80.8 Pts
Poor: 61% Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 88.3
Parallax 152
87% 116 fps
MRender 87.5
Gravity 111
Splatting 126
91% 108 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 37 37 39 39 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
380% Outstanding
Read 4,955
Write 42.9
Mixed 86.6
SusWrite 35.3
266% 1,280 MB/s
4K Read 442
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 5.5
677% 150 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 380%
Great: 280%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
612GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1429 803 415 368 355 359 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 117%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
931GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 98 98 98 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 88.8
Write 96.3
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 97.1
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
814GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 203 204 205 204 202 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 120
Write 88.4
Mixed 72
SusWrite 200
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 113%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 101 104 103 102 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 113
Write 108
Mixed 92.6
SusWrite 101
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 83%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 117 116 119 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 114
Write 107
Mixed 87
SusWrite 117
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
169% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 500GB
466GB free, PID 0b09
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 35.2
Write 32.1
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 33.3
44% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3466C1994/8G KHX3466C19D4/8G 16GB
2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
100% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 31.8
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 28.4
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,667 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $652
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback