Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Battleship	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '20 at 09:10
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	72%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Memory 79.7 1-Core 120 2-Core 234 80% 145 Pts	4-Core 469 8-Core 822 78% 646 Pts	64-Core 1,260 78% 1,260 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.7.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 88.1 Parallax 163 87% 120 fps	MRender 87 Gravity 111 Splatting 124 90% 107 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 24 25 25 25 22 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	222% Outstanding	Read 2,956 Write 20.3 Mixed 38.3 SusWrite 23.4 158% 759 MB/s	4K Read 252 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 3.6 387% 85.7 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 222% Great: 280%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB 1,069 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 275GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 653 255 80 84 82 85 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 117%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 202GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 71 71 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 80.8 Write 64.3 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 70.2 48% 65.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 814GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 183 184 186 190 187 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Read 122 Write 115 Mixed 72 SusWrite 186 90% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 113%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB 8,194 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 104 105 107 105 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 97.2 Write 88.7 Mixed 87.5 SusWrite 105 70% 94.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.4 117% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 112%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 97 94 95 97 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 120 Write 101 Mixed 89.5 SusWrite 94.8 75% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 132% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 83%
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 500GB 133 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 466GB free, PID 0b09 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 30 30 30 30 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 33 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 29.9 43% 31.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 114% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX3466C1994/8G KHX3466C19D4/8G 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 2933, 2933 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	98% Outstanding	MC Read 39.6 MC Write 34.5 MC Mixed 32.5 102% 35.5 GB/s	SC Read 26.1 SC Write 35.1 SC Mixed 28.3 85% 29.8 GB/s	Latency 81.1 49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,667 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,414x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	543x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $175Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	536x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	323x
RTX 2060Nvidia $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	231x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	209x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	175x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	172x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $70Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	246x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	185x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	157x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $652

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16