Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive392% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190125
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 03 '20 at 08:45
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 79.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 238
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 892
81% 679 Pts
64-Core 1,296
80% 1,296 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 89%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 39 40 40 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
392% Outstanding
Read 5,204
Write 42.5
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 38.5
278% 1,339 MB/s
4K Read 452
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 2.4
690% 152 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 392%
Great: 280%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
275GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 751 87 149 86 114 90 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 117%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
202GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
39% Below average
Read 55.5
Write 66
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 80.1
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
814GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 200 199 200 202 201 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 128
Write 104
Mixed 72
SusWrite 200
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 113%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 117 117 116 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 105
Write 96.3
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 116
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 112%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 104 101 101 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 111
Write 101
Mixed 89
SusWrite 102
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 83%
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 500GB
466GB free, PID 0b09
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 36
Write 32.5
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 33.3
43% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3466C1994/8G KHX3466C19D4/8G 16GB
2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
99.4% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 32.1
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 29.1
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,667 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $652
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback