Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190125
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 28 '20 at 09:49
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	73%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Memory 81.5 1-Core 120 2-Core 240 82% 147 Pts	4-Core 457 8-Core 812 76% 634 Pts	64-Core 1,294 80% 1,294 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 88.2 Parallax 151 87% 115 fps	MRender 87.8 Gravity 111 Splatting 126 91% 108 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 21 22 23 23 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	216% Outstanding	Read 2,787 Write 22 Mixed 43.2 SusWrite 21 149% 718 MB/s	4K Read 253 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 3.7 389% 86.1 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 216% Great: 280%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB 1,069 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 249GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 583 112 82 81 85 83 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 117%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 117GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 68 67 68 67 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 53 Write 58.2 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 68.3 41% 55.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 814GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 180 183 185 188 187 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 117 Write 101 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 184 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 113%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB 8,194 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 100 100 104 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 133 Write 110 Mixed 97.5 SusWrite 101 82% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 132% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 112%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 93 92 97 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	55.6% Above average	Read 101 Write 102 Mixed 89.2 SusWrite 92.8 71% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 134% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 83%
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 500GB 133 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 466GB free, PID 0b09 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 30 30 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 33 Write 32.5 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 29.3 42% 30.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 114% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX3466C1994/8G KHX3466C19D4/8G 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 2933, 2933 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	98% Outstanding	MC Read 40.4 MC Write 34.7 MC Mixed 31.9 102% 35.7 GB/s	SC Read 23.6 SC Write 35.5 SC Mixed 27.8 83% 29 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,667 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,414x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	543x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $175Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	536x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	323x
RTX 2060Nvidia $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	231x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	209x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	175x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	172x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	246x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	185x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	157x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $652

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16