Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170320
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 03 '20 at 14:07
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 69.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 196
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 737
67% 565 Pts
64-Core 1,063
66% 1,063 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.3% Below average
Lighting 40.5
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 36.5
33% 36.3 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 36.9
31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Delora D1 SSD 120GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0517A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 274 5.4 19 6.5 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 378
Write 339
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 100
45% 206 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
32% 7.27 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
102GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 75 75 75 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
44% Average
Read 78.2
Write 81
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 74.5
55% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
21GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 144 148 149 149 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 125
Write 80.4
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 148
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 112%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
1TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 113 113 113 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 97.8
Write 35.4
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 112
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 11.7
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 17.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback