Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 162% UFO	Desktop 108% UFO	Workstation 174% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	55.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200721
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '20 at 21:34
Run Duration	362 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430 107,269 User benchmarks, average bench 100% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Memory 95.6 1-Core 158 2-Core 315 103% 190 Pts	4-Core 631 8-Core 1,164 107% 897 Pts	64-Core 2084 129% 2084 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 106%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2387) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	152% Outstanding	Lighting 212 Reflection 223 Parallax 217 173% 217 fps	MRender 241 Gravity 209 Splatting 125 150% 192 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55 495,311 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 363GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1111 883 869 862 861 854 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	279% Outstanding	Read 2,574 Write 2346 Mixed 1,775 SusWrite 907 425% 1,900 MB/s	4K Read 61.6 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 81.7 270% 93.2 MB/s	DQ Read 962 DQ Write 680 DQ Mixed 854 629% 832 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 279% Great: 346%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 229GB free Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 483 484 484 482 483 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 481 Mixed 393 SusWrite 484 104% 463 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 57.9 190% 66.5 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 357 268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 131%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 17GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 397 Write 387 Mixed 313 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 81.8 4K Mixed 48.8 166% 56.9 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 174 155% 232 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 146GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 109 108 106 105 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 404 Write 384 Mixed 375 SusWrite 105 71% 317 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 88 4K Mixed 52.5 173% 59.8 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 275 205% 271 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 83GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,456 Write 2,354 Mixed 1,629 478% 2,146 MB/s	4K Read 59.6 4K Write 135 4K Mixed 77.9 261% 90.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,015 DQ Write 704 DQ Mixed 898 660% 872 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 23GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 495 Write 477 Mixed 408 102% 460 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 99.7 4K Mixed 58.1 190% 66.4 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 356 268% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 187GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 101 101 101 101 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 85.5 Write 78.8 Mixed 63.9 SusWrite 100 61% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 173% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 314GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 59 60 65 66 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 106 Write 93.8 Mixed 73.2 SusWrite 61.5 62% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 29GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 58 60 65 66 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 114 Write 120 Mixed 82.9 SusWrite 61.5 70% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 122GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 123 125 124 125 124 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 80 Write 74.5 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 124 60% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 91GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 108 106 105 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 68.5 Write 94.8 Mixed 59.2 SusWrite 105 60% 82 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.5 199% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 596GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 60 65 66 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 100 Write 99.6 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 61.4 59% 80.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.5 200% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 90%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 82GB free, PID 1018 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	21.6% Poor	Read 41.5 Write 39.1 Mixed 33.1 SusWrite 39.7 52% 38.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 4x16GB 1,664 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 40 MC Write 44.1 MC Mixed 33.8 112% 39.3 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 51.4 SC Mixed 32.5 100% 35 GB/s	Latency 55.1 73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 143%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 205%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 219%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA - $500

CPU
Core i9-10900KIntel $430Bench 100%, 107,269 samples	718x
Core i7-10700KIntel $224Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	143x
Core i9-10850KIntel $249Bench 99%, 84,873 samples	130x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,135Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	249x
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	183x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	132x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	182x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	91x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $159Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	79x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $167Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	31x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 118%, 249 samples	24x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $2,325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359