Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 147% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 151% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	47.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200721
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '20 at 18:00
Run Duration	359 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430 107,269 User benchmarks, average bench 100% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 94.2 1-Core 151 2-Core 303 100% 183 Pts	4-Core 570 8-Core 971 94% 770 Pts	64-Core 1,826 113% 1,826 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 106%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2387) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	146% Outstanding	Lighting 201 Reflection 207 Parallax 210 164% 206 fps	MRender 227 Gravity 203 Splatting 126 145% 185 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 146% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55 495,311 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 364GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1031 884 885 880 862 853 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	224% Outstanding	Read 1880 Write 1,617 Mixed 1355 SusWrite 899 322% 1,438 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 94.1 4K Mixed 59.6 189% 65.1 MB/s	DQ Read 910 DQ Write 656 DQ Mixed 822 604% 796 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 224% Great: 346%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 229GB free Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 458 464 469 467 470 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 485 Write 475 Mixed 402 SusWrite 459 102% 455 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 87.8 4K Mixed 46.8 162% 57.2 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 356 268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 131%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 17GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 483 Write 456 Mixed 390 99% 443 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 89.5 4K Mixed 49.1 168% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 195 172% 255 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 146GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 431 402 371 361 356 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 457 Mixed 449 SusWrite 390 100% 443 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 94.5 4K Mixed 54 177% 62.2 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 297 DQ Mixed 304 225% 297 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 83GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,404 Write 2,160 Mixed 1,602 457% 2,055 MB/s	4K Read 51.7 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 72.2 229% 77.9 MB/s	DQ Read 949 DQ Write 675 DQ Mixed 864 631% 829 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 23GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 489 Write 466 Mixed 396 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 50.3 166% 56.9 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 355 267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 187GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 100 101 100 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 90 Write 83.1 Mixed 54.3 SusWrite 99.8 60% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.8 174% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 314GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 15 15 18 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	29.6% Poor	Read 85.7 Write 63.1 Mixed 61.6 SusWrite 16.8 42% 56.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 29GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 32 30 31 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	20% Poor	Read 39.3 Write 56.8 Mixed 26.9 SusWrite 30.4 28% 38.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 52% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 122GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 16 16 18 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Read 39.5 Write 24.4 Mixed 30.6 SusWrite 16.8 21% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 92GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 115 132 125 121 132 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 96.7 Write 100 Mixed 56.8 SusWrite 126 69% 94.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.5 196% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 596GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 33 45 30 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	26% Poor	Read 52.2 Write 79.4 Mixed 51.1 SusWrite 38.2 41% 55.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 88% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 90%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 82GB free, PID 1018 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 35 Write 38.5 Mixed 33.6 SusWrite 39.5 51% 36.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 4x16GB 1,664 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	96.4% Outstanding	MC Read 33.6 MC Write 40.7 MC Mixed 31.1 100% 35.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 36.6 SC Mixed 24.5 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 59.4 67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 143%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 205%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 219%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA - $500

CPU
Core i9-10900KIntel $430Bench 100%, 107,269 samples	718x
Core i7-10700KIntel $224Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	143x
Core i9-10850KIntel $249Bench 99%, 84,873 samples	130x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,135Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	249x
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	183x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	132x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	182x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	91x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $159Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	79x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $167Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	31x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 118%, 249 samples	24x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $2,325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359