Asus PRIME Z390-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics62.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive346% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-A  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '20 at 20:42
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User VAT-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 133
2-Core 266
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 739
79% 632 Pts
64-Core 776
48% 776 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
ASRock(1849 5032) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.7% Good
Lighting 78.9
Reflection 78.5
Parallax 110
64% 89 fps
MRender 77
Gravity 79.2
Splatting 65.2
60% 73.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$104
793GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1739 1655 1625 1488 1465 1476 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
346% Outstanding
Read 2,549
Write 2,364
Mixed 1,538
SusWrite 1,575
450% 2,007 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 83.4
271% 92.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,630
DQ Write 1,224
DQ Mixed 1,395
1,052% 1,416 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 346%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
418GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 480 482 482 422 290 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 482
Mixed 441
SusWrite 440
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 55.8
187% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 354
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 121%
Great: 129%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
466GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 464 466 467 465 469 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 449
Mixed 438
SusWrite 466
105% 464 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 50.9
172% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 290
237% 337 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 118%
Great: 125%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
375GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 450 452 453 451 453 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 422
Mixed 403
SusWrite 452
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 26.7
132% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 34.5
92% 191 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 92%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
343GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 372 225 229 228 285 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 351
Write 119
Mixed 103
SusWrite 299
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 22.5
4K Mixed 12.2
59% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 16.4
DQ Write 17.4
DQ Mixed 16.9
13% 16.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
982GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 149 148 150 149 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 112
Mixed 79
SusWrite 147
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3274 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 33.9
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 46.2
SC Mixed 30.4
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 55.2
72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 111%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z390-A Builds (Compare 26,655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-A - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,096
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback