Asus PRIME Z390-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics62.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive338% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-A  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '20 at 20:27
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User VAT-User
Background CPU 50%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 129
2-Core 260
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 744
79% 633 Pts
64-Core 765
47% 765 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
ASRock(1849 5032) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.9% Good
Lighting 79.3
Reflection 78.9
Parallax 99.6
65% 85.9 fps
MRender 76.7
Gravity 79.4
Splatting 65.3
60% 73.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
793GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1779 1656 1638 1665 1562 1506 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 2,345
Write 2,357
Mixed 1,758
SusWrite 1,634
455% 2,024 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 82.9
268% 91.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,558
DQ Write 1,157
DQ Mixed 1,333
1,003% 1,349 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 338%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
418GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 465 466 466 442 290 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 484
Mixed 457
SusWrite 431
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 53.9
182% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 355
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 120%
Great: 129%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
466GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 448 450 449 443 458 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 457
Mixed 411
SusWrite 448
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 51.2
156% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 291
238% 338 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 113%
Great: 125%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
375GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 435 438 437 430 446 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 445
Mixed 410
SusWrite 436
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 27.5
133% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 33.9
95% 199 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 92%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
343GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 402 209 222 215 221 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 424
Mixed 374
SusWrite 281
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 41.7
153% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 230
201% 296 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
982GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 150 147 151 147 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 166
Write 115
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 147
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3274 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 33.4
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 32
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 56.7
70% 56.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 112%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z390-A Builds (Compare 26,658 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-A - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,082
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback