Asus PRIME Z390-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics62% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive347% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-A  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200604
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 29 '20 at 19:58
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User VAT-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 134
2-Core 266
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 765
81% 645 Pts
64-Core 746
46% 746 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
ASRock(1849 5032) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62% Good
Lighting 77.6
Reflection 81
Parallax 98.6
63% 85.7 fps
MRender 76.4
Gravity 79
Splatting 65.3
59% 73.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
794GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1791 1661 1654 1652 1606 1490 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
347% Outstanding
Read 2,563
Write 2,318
Mixed 1,767
SusWrite 1,642
465% 2,072 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 81.4
268% 91.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,557
DQ Write 1,170
DQ Mixed 1,330
1,004% 1,352 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 347%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
418GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 459 475 473 440 289 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 484
Mixed 458
SusWrite 433
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 54.1
183% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 355
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 120%
Great: 129%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
466GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 446 461 460 461 466 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 464
Mixed 441
SusWrite 457
105% 468 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 97.1
4K Mixed 51.1
172% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 291
237% 338 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 118%
Great: 125%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
375GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 430 446 444 445 450 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 434
Mixed 410
SusWrite 441
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 27
137% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 34.4
96% 202 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 100%
Great: 92%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
343GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 346 215 219 225 228 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 402
Mixed 344
SusWrite 280
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 41.2
151% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 222
191% 278 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
982GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 174 176 173 176 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 112
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 172
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3274 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 43.4
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 34
115% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 46.4
SC Mixed 31.9
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 112%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z390-A Builds (Compare 26,658 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-A - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,082
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback