Asus PRIME Z390-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics62.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive350% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-A  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200604
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 01 '20 at 11:45
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User VAT-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 266
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 771
81% 647 Pts
64-Core 772
48% 772 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
ASRock(1849 5032) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.8% Good
Lighting 79.2
Reflection 78.5
Parallax 97.6
64% 85.1 fps
MRender 76.8
Gravity 78.8
Splatting 65
59% 73.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
794GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1775 1653 1629 1656 1658 1656 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
350% Outstanding
Read 2,562
Write 2325
Mixed 1,748
SusWrite 1,671
466% 2,077 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 82.8
270% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,579
DQ Write 1,204
DQ Mixed 1,367
1,029% 1,383 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 350%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
418GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 476 481 475 427 291 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 487
Mixed 462
SusWrite 438
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 56.5
191% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 355
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 122%
Great: 129%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
466GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 462 466 461 466 469 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 460
Mixed 440
SusWrite 464
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 52.7
172% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 294
239% 338 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 119%
Great: 125%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
375GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 447 452 447 452 454 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 443
Mixed 404
SusWrite 450
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 30.7
139% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 36.5
98% 205 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 103%
Great: 92%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
343GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 313 226 224 221 224 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 271
Write 106
Mixed 323
SusWrite 271
55% 243 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 41.3
155% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 224
191% 277 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
982GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 175 176 175 176 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 134
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 174
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3274 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 43.6
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 34.2
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 46.8
SC Mixed 32
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 113%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z390-A Builds (Compare 26,660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-A - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,092
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback