Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '20 at 02:08
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 90.3
1-Core 152
2-Core 325
101% 189 Pts
4-Core 650
8-Core 1,287
114% 968 Pts
64-Core 1,288
80% 1,288 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 106%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1375 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 85.1
55% 74 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 66
Splatting 56
50% 61.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141
158GB free
Firmware: OC34L5TP Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 653 666 663 667 665 669 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,221
Write 646
Mixed 493
SusWrite 664
168% 756 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 45.1
171% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 112
148% 268 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 157%
Great: 159%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$125
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 571 572 509 201 120 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 886
Write 562
Mixed 658
SusWrite 349
137% 614 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 50.8
182% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 501
DQ Write 539
DQ Mixed 467
366% 502 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 136%
Great: 144%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
928GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 81 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 90.4
Write 82.5
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 80.9
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 57%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
725GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 82 82 82 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 84.7
Write 86
Mixed 66
SusWrite 81.4
59% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 57%
Hitachi HTS542560K9SA00 60GB
44GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 38.6
Write 37.5
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 40.9
48% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C15-8GTZRX 04CD F4-2400C15-8GTZR 04CD F4-2400C15-8GTZR 04CD F4-2400C15-8GTZRX 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 25.4
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 25.1
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback