Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '20 at 01:35
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 88.2
1-Core 133
2-Core 325
96% 182 Pts
4-Core 649
8-Core 1268
114% 959 Pts
64-Core 1,288
80% 1,288 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 65.5
Parallax 79.3
52% 69.5 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 61.6
Splatting 53.3
48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141
158GB free
Firmware: OC34L5TP Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 618 622 619 615 618 617 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,188
Write 604
Mixed 496
SusWrite 618
161% 727 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 43.7
158% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 79.9
116% 218 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 147%
Great: 159%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$125
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 558 558 281 328 119 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 884
Write 550
Mixed 644
SusWrite 327
134% 601 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 50.5
179% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 501
DQ Write 531
DQ Mixed 461
362% 498 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 134%
Great: 144%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
928GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 87
Write 80.6
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 80.1
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 57%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
725GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 75 78 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 88.1
Write 82.2
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 78
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 57%
Hitachi HTS542560K9SA00 60GB
44GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 38
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 40.3
47% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C15-8GTZRX 04CD F4-2400C15-8GTZR 04CD F4-2400C15-8GTZR 04CD F4-2400C15-8GTZRX 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 25.2
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 24.7
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $194

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $801
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback