Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '20 at 01:57
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 87.6
1-Core 162
2-Core 326
103% 192 Pts
4-Core 651
8-Core 1284
114% 968 Pts
64-Core 1,270
79% 1,270 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1375 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Lighting 62
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 82.4
50% 71.3 fps
MRender 62.3
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 56.1
49% 60.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141
158GB free
Firmware: OC34L5TP Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 663 664 663 664 667 666 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,225
Write 667
Mixed 477
SusWrite 664
168% 758 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 96.1
4K Mixed 45.3
171% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 424
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 105
149% 279 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 158%
Great: 159%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$125
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 571 572 512 200 120 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 897
Write 563
Mixed 658
SusWrite 349
138% 617 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 51
183% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 501
DQ Write 539
DQ Mixed 467
366% 502 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 137%
Great: 144%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
928GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 81 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 86
Write 81.5
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 81.4
57% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 57%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
725GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 80 82 83 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 91.1
Write 82.6
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 81.6
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 57%
Hitachi HTS542560K9SA00 60GB
44GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 38.4
Write 39
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 40.9
48% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C15-8GTZRX 04CD F4-2400C15-8GTZR 04CD F4-2400C15-8GTZR 04CD F4-2400C15-8GTZRX 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 25.4
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 25.7
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $194

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $801
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback